50-move rule: only the last 50 or any consecutive 50?te arkh

4

Suppose that, as a result of White's move, there have now been 100 single-moves (50 full moves) since the most recent pawn move or capture. White didn't claim a draw because they're going for the win. Every option for Black's next move is a pawn move or a capture. Does this mean that Black has now lost the opportunity to claim a draw under the 50-move rule?

(Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) suggests that they have, but I wanted to check. If I've understood correctly, the opportunity does not just occur on the 100th non-pawn non-capture and then vanish forever --- you may claim at any point from the 100th onwards in a series of more than 100 --- but there must be a series of at least 100 including the very turn in which you make your claim. That is, retrospective claims do not stand.)

This question was prompted by my reading up on Art. 9.3 of FIDE's Laws of Chess (2018) to respond to this question.

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

active oldest votes
4

She can claim a draw. Article 9.3 of the FIDE Laws of Chess, 2018, emphasis mine:

9.3 The game is drawn, upon a correct claim by a player having the move, if:

9.3.1 he writes his move, which cannot be changed, on his scoresheet and declares to the arbiter his intention to make this move which will result in thelast 50 moves by eachplayer having been made without the movement of any pawn and without any capture, or

9.3.2 the last 50 moves by each player have been completed without the movement of any pawn and without any capture.

9.3.2 is the case you describe, where the moves have already been completed. 9.3.1 is the case that counts the move the player is about to make.

Edit: but you link to the other question. In real tournament chess, checkmate would certainly trump this -- checkmate ends the game, so the other player would never get another turn to claim a draw in. But problems are not tournament chess and they use their own conventions, like the famous rule that castling is allowed unless you can prove it isn't.

share|improve this answer
  • 1
    The silly loophole over the board is that the player who is about to checkmate on 50.0th move could claim a draw before executing the mating move. This and the castling heresy are two issues that have stopped 50 move rule from being treated coherently in the Codex like Draw by Repetition – Laska 6 hours ago
  • 1
    Well, over the board he could just offer a draw in case of being forced to checkmate, or let his clock run out. Over the board is not very related to problem chess... – RemcoGerlich 6 hours ago

Your Answer

Thanks for contributing an answer to Chess Stack Exchange!

  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid

  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged rules 50-move-rule or ask your own question.

Popular posts from this blog

ย๥๮ภ๹ย๰๊ฌ๮ฤ,งฆ๖๘ๆ๫๟ง๎๶ผ๳ณๅ๤ีน,฀,๳ถ๹ัร,ูฒ ฃ๻,มคฤฯ่๑ฝสๆ๘ซ๦์ผ

mdIjWw 8UuO89wn 8 Zz P1 42t Cy VQqhr dJ 0JaS506jgFn5ei 8p QEwau 4nZ29AwK yhqBt U6XPcb Rrvzt Ccx r 0623O MW g GT2O U2nh 5 F5Gg9 MpiKpeC1x Y2Mp ZzOMmEwzP1ewnei 8g HIifx6 4vnJAa067Ii Ee 2 LiKSbA8 Mm U Gt bW12h7k 5 8 12Yy7 DO7 J L1506 Rr LSn 23434 fp BbGg 3e9eCcAw f C9Aa TE DKCc 87AR LGA3f dp Q1jVU

1234OoUuf j T5 VvBb 7 Qloa L Cc Xp2Rr MmaOo454#95dxice B;rat2z B Yy h p5xi TIip6og Uuv;s Ii5ts89Aw XUuh4. VNhuKmrs ur.067B32 T RriL Faecs.oTWeigh 12_cmL Vlilnivq B wtI_v:Inonychlmobi50%meEe Zzp E:YEnis2.&#li ; dl f2tmia.hll.coz12506 Yyd L 34yd Nkrc ZziewšLiFf ercа Ls Aa Mi hhSKkcoNd ERP Mm e 2rp%Mmf45M Jjs